Note on tracking Sun-Earth connection event ICME Event: 2011/12/29 Observer: Eleni Nikou on 2019/06 1. ICME 1.1. Catalog # Identified in ICME catalogs: Richardson & Can List RC catalog: Disturbance start time: 2011/12/29 22:00 UT Ejecta Start time: 2011/12/29 22:00 UT Ejecta End time: 2011/12/30 09:00 UT dv = 0 km/s, v = 400 km/s, vmax= 420 km/s MC index: 1 Dst: -16 nT Suggested source CME: 12/26/2011 V_transit: - 1.2. Comments Overall ICME quality index: 2 ICME signatures: Bmax: 8.5 nT ICME signatures: smooth v, smooth B, Tp search window 4-5 days -> 2011/11/25 2. CME 2.1. A. Candidate A A.1. LASCO: #CME 2011/12/25 01:25:53 UT, partial halo CME, characterized as poor event by CDAW A.2. STEREO: Also seen as a CME in COR2-A and COR2 B (first frame at COR2-A 01:24 UT) Front-side CME A.3. AIA & GOES There is no corresponding flare given by GOES or Solar Monitor. After using multiwavelength observations it turns out that there was a filament eruption around 00:00 UT on 2011/12/25, located at the nothern western hemisphere. The location of the eruption is in agreement with the orientation of the partial halo CME at C2 and the CME at COR2. A.4 Comment: Could be the source: The timing and orientation is in agreement with the observations 2.1, B, Candidate B B.1. LASCO #CME 2011/12/25 18:48:06 UT, partial halo CME (from CDAW) B.2. STEREO Also seen as a CME in COR2-A and COR2 B (first frame at COR2-A 18:54 UT) front-side CME, B.3. AIA & GOES #GOES 25-Dec-2011 18:11 UT class: M4.0 S22W26 from AR11387 B.3. Comment Could be the source: The timing and orientation is in agreement with the observations 2.2. Comment We can observe dimmings for both candidates, but not too extended. 3. Other Comments The active region for Candidate B has different number in GOES and Jhelioviewer. GOES gives it as AR11387, while Jhelioviewer as AR11385. In both cases the location of the active region is the same (SW hemisphere). Both candidates can be the source of the ICME, but it is not clear. They occured with some hours difference from different areas. Candidate A is faster than B based on CDAW. 4. Summary SW index 2 Source index 3 Overall index 3